| Autor | 
    Nachricht | 
  
  
    | 
      
     | 
    
      
        
					
            Titel:  
             Verfasst am: 28.11.2006, 10:55 Uhr
           | 
				 
       
     | 
  
  
    
      
        
          
             
            
  
            Anmeldung: 02. Feb 2006 
            Beiträge: 55 
             
            
            
           | 
         
       
     | 
    
      
        
          my bad.
 
 
that should be "rcS.d" !!!  (edited in earlier post). | 
         
        
          | 
          
            
          
            
            
           | 
         
         
	        |     | 
	       
       
     | 
  
  
    | 
      
      
     | 
  
  
      | 
  
  
    | 
      
     | 
    
      
        
					
            Titel:  
             Verfasst am: 28.11.2006, 12:52 Uhr
           | 
				 
       
     | 
  
  
    
      
        
          
             
            
  
            Anmeldung: 26. Nov 2006 
            Beiträge: 85 
             
            
            
           | 
         
       
     | 
    
      
        
          Yes that worked. But sadly my connection still wont automatically start on boot.
 
 
To be clear I removed the S99eth0_up script you posted earlier and ran
 
 
Code: 
ln -s /etc/init.d/ipw3945d /etc/rcS.d/S39ipw3945d
 
 
 
 
as root - which executed/completed without complaint.
 
 
I then edited my /etc/hosts/interfaces file to add the eth2 interface to the auto line, in order that both eth0 and eth2 would be available on boot. (although I do not have an ethernet cable plugged in to my wired networking port (eth0) right now.
 
 
This is how it looks now:
 
 
Code: 
# /etc/network/interfaces -- configuration file for ifup(8), ifdown(8)
 
 
# The loopback interface
 
# automatically added when upgrading
 
auto lo eth0 eth2
 
iface lo inet loopback
 
 
iface eth0 inet static
 
   address 192.168.2.102
 
   netmask 255.255.255.0
 
   network 192.168.1.0
 
   broadcast 192.168.1.255
 
#   gateway 192.168.1.1
 
 
 
 
 
 
iface eth2 inet static
 
   address 192.168.1.104
 
   netmask 255.255.255.0
 
   network 192.168.1.0
 
   broadcast 192.168.1.255
 
   gateway 192.168.1.1
 
 wireless-mode Managed
 
 wireless_key s:elephant.1234
 
 wireless-essid Homer1
 
 
 
 
There was one other file in rcS.d called S38ipw3945d - but I removed this as instructed. I can see no further reference to it in this directory.
 
 
The remaining contents of that directory are as follows:
 
 
Code: 
README               S11hwclock.sh             S36mtab.sh      S46mountnfs-bootclean.sh
 
S01glibc.sh          S18ifupdown-clean         S36udev-mtab    S46setserial
 
S01splashy-init      S20module-init-tools      S38pppd-dns     S48console-screen.sh
 
S02mountkernfs.sh    S20modutils               S39dns-clean    S50alsa-utils
 
S03udev              S25libdevmapper1.02       S39ifupdown     S55bootmisc.sh
 
S04mountdevsubfs.sh  S30checkfs.sh             S39ipw3945d     S55urandom
 
S05bootlogd          S30etc-setserial          S40hostname.sh  S70x11-common
 
S05initrd-tools.sh   S30procps.sh              S40networking   S75sudo
 
S05keymap.sh         S35mountall.sh            S43portmap      S99stop-bootlogd-single
 
S10checkroot.sh      S36mountall-bootclean.sh  S45mountnfs.sh
 
 
 
As far as I understand it, the objective is to get the ipw3945 daemon started before my network comes up - and currently this isn't happening - although again there appears to be no clear reason why this is he case.
 
 
BTW I am perfectly happy with the solution that I have where I am running the start up script for my network as a service - but really if we can figure this out, then it is probably a bug - and maybe if we fix it, or find out what's wrong we can report it to Kano? I mean Kanotix is after all an RC right now, so maybe if it can be fixed we can help others in the same position as me - and make wireless networking in Kaotix much easier in the future?
 
 
Of course, if you don't have the time for this - or just don't know how to fix it, that is perfectly fine too. | 
         
        
          | 
          
            
          
            
            
           | 
         
         
	        |     | 
	       
       
     | 
  
  
    | 
      
      
     | 
  
  
      | 
  
  
    | 
      
     | 
    
      
        
					
            Titel:  
             Verfasst am: 28.11.2006, 13:38 Uhr
           | 
				 
       
     | 
  
  
    
      
        
          
             
            
  
            Anmeldung: 02. Feb 2006 
            Beiträge: 55 
             
            
            
           | 
         
       
     | 
    
      
        
          Hmmm, this is turning out to be quite a tricky one!
 
 
You already had ipw3945d starting at level S38, so on an earlier moment than the network comes up. Could you put it bakc this way? (so change the S39ipw3945d to S38ipw3945d ).
 
 
If this daemon is started at that time, and it apparently is running at a later time, then it must be placed in the background, still doing something or waiting for something.
 
 
Maybe the timeout it generates on start should be increased to give it more time.
 
In /etc/init.d/ipw3945d you'll find:
 
 
Code: 
 
start_daemon() {
 
  if have_sys_entries; then
 
    remove_stale_pid
 
    log_daemon_msg "Starting ipw3945 regulatory daemon" "ipw3945d"
 
    start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --chuid "${DAEMON_OWNER}"                \
 
                      --exec "${DAEMON_BINARY}" --pidfile "${DAEMON_PID_FILE}" \
 
                      --oknodo -- --pid-file=${DAEMON_PID_FILE} --quiet        \
 
            --log-file=${DAEMON_LOG_FILE} > /dev/null 2>&1
 
    code=$?
 
    log_end_msg ${code}
 
    sleep 1
 
  else
 
    log_warning_msg "Not starting ipw3945 regulatory daemon, driver not loaded."
 
  fi
 
}
 
 
 
 
Right at the end (5 lines above the end to be exact), you can see "sleep 1"
 
Can you change the value here? To "sleep 10" for instance?
 
You can play a bit with the value here, that might do the trick. | 
         
        
          | 
          
            
          
            
            
           | 
         
         
	        |     | 
	       
       
     | 
  
  
    | 
      
      
     | 
  
  
      | 
  
  
    | 
      
     | 
    
      
        
					
            Titel:  
             Verfasst am: 28.11.2006, 13:55 Uhr
           | 
				 
       
     | 
  
  
    
      
        
          
             
            
  
            Anmeldung: 26. Nov 2006 
            Beiträge: 85 
             
            
            
           | 
         
       
     | 
    
      
        
          You may be inadvertantly on to something here. My /etc/init.d/ipw3945d differs significantly from yours. There is no "sleep1" or any other sleep instruction at all:
 
 
Code: 
#!/bin/sh
 
 
### BEGIN INIT INFO
 
# Provides:      ipw3945d
 
# Required-Start:   mountvirtfs $local_fs
 
# Required-Stop:   
 
# Should-Start:      udev
 
# Should-Stop:      
 
# Default-Start:   S
 
# Default-Stop:      0 6
 
# Short-Description:   Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Regulatory Daemon
 
# Description:      A userspace regulatory daemon daemon responsible for
 
#         controlling and configuring aspects of the hardware
 
#         required to operate the device within compliance of
 
#         various regulatory agencies.
 
### END INIT INFO
 
 
PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
 
 
IPW3945D=/sbin/ipw3945d
 
NAME=ipw3945d
 
DESC="ipw3945 regulatory daemon"
 
PIDFILE="/var/run/ipw3945d.pid"
 
OPTIONS="--quiet --pid-file=$PIDFILE"
 
TEST_OPTIONS="--isrunning --pid-file=$PIDFILE"
 
 
if [ ! -x "$IPW3945D" ]; then
 
   exit 0
 
fi
 
 
. /lib/lsb/init-functions
 
 
case "$1" in
 
   start)
 
      log_daemon_msg "Starting $DESC"
 
 
      # daemon is already running
 
      if start-stop-daemon --start --oknodo --quiet --name $NAME \
 
         --startas $IPW3945D --pidfile $PIDFILE -- $TEST_OPTIONS; then
 
         log_progress_msg "$NAME process already started"
 
         log_end_msg 0
 
         exit 0
 
      fi
 
      
 
      # ipw3945 hardware and/or module not present
 
      if [ ! -e /sys/bus/pci/drivers/ipw3945/*/cmd ]; then
 
         log_progress_msg "hardware or kernel module not present"
 
         log_end_msg 0
 
         exit 0
 
      fi
 
      
 
      # start daemon
 
      if start-stop-daemon --start --oknodo --quiet --name $NAME \
 
         --startas $IPW3945D --pidfile $PIDFILE -- $OPTIONS; then
 
         log_progress_msg "$NAME"
 
         log_end_msg 0
 
      else
 
         log_end_msg 1
 
         exit 1
 
      fi         
 
      ;;
 
   stop)
 
      # check to see if daemon is running
 
      if start-stop-daemon --start --oknodo --quiet --name $NAME \
 
         --startas $IPW3945D --pidfile $PIDFILE -- $TEST_OPTIONS; then
 
         log_daemon_msg "Stopping $DESC"
 
         log_progress_msg "$NAME"
 
         # kill the daemon
 
         if start-stop-daemon --stop --oknodo --quiet \
 
            --exec $IPW3945D --pidfile $PIDFILE; then
 
            log_end_msg 0
 
            # remove stale pidfile
 
            if [ -f "$PIDFILE" ]; then
 
               rm -f "$PIDFILE"
 
            fi
 
         else
 
            log_end_msg 1
 
            exit 1
 
         fi
 
      fi
 
      ;;
 
   restart|force-reload)
 
      $0 stop
 
      $0 start
 
      ;;
 
   *)
 
      echo "Usage: $0 {start|stop|restart|force-reload}" >&2
 
      exit 3
 
      ;;
 
esac
 
 
exit 0
 
 
 
There are also a number of other diferences that you might note. | 
         
        
          | 
          
            
          
            
            
           | 
         
         
	        |     | 
	       
       
     | 
  
  
    | 
      
      
     | 
  
  
      | 
  
  
    | 
      
     | 
    
      
        
					
            Titel:  
             Verfasst am: 28.11.2006, 13:56 Uhr
           | 
				 
       
     | 
  
  
    
      
        
          
             
            
  
            Anmeldung: 02. Feb 2006 
            Beiträge: 55 
             
            
            
           | 
         
       
     | 
    
      
     | 
  
  
    | 
      
      
     | 
  
  
      | 
  
  
    | 
      
     | 
    
      
        
					
            Titel:  
             Verfasst am: 28.11.2006, 15:36 Uhr
           | 
				 
       
     | 
  
  
    
      
        
          
             
            
  
            Anmeldung: 26. Nov 2006 
            Beiträge: 85 
             
            
            
           | 
         
       
     | 
    
      
        
          Yes that worked beautifully, with no more errors. No need to adjust the timeout value at all.
 
 
Hopefully Kano will include this in the final release.
 
 
Issue marked as solved!
 
 
Many thanks! | 
         
        
          | 
          
            
          
            
            
           | 
         
         
	        |     | 
	       
       
     | 
  
  
    | 
      
      
     | 
  
  
      | 
  
  
    | 
      
     | 
    
      
        
					
            Titel:  
             Verfasst am: 30.11.2006, 19:10 Uhr
           | 
				 
       
     | 
  
  
    
      
        
          
             
            
  
            Anmeldung: 26. Nov 2006 
            Beiträge: 85 
             
            
            
           | 
         
       
     | 
    
      
        
          OK, can someone please explain why when I installed a new Kernel 2.6.18.1-kanotix-1 wireless networking stopped working?
 
 
Is there something I need to reinstall to get it to work again when I install each new official Kanotix kernel?
 
 
Thanks! | 
         
        
          | 
          
            
          
            
            
           | 
         
         
	        |     | 
	       
       
     | 
  
  
    | 
      
      
     | 
  
  
      | 
  
  
  
    | 
      
     |